| June 11 Deepak Statement from SM - Goto page 1, 2 Next |
| View previous topic
:: View next topic |
castlerocklives
 Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:52 pm |
|
|
|
June 11 Deepak Statement from SM
This is now posted on Scared Monkeys, I don't know how to copy it so I re-typed it exactly as it is posted:
Proces-Verbaa
We, Roland Ramiro TROMP and Shaniro Baldrick KELLY, respectively inspector and officer first class with the Korps Police Aruba and both assigned to the section Often Occurring Crimesl district 2, state/declare the following
On June 11th 2005 approximately 23.00 hours, we, the reporting officers, were on our way to Sint Nicolaas to bring suspect Deepak Sharma KALPOE to the police station situated there, in order for him yo be locked up.
While we, the reporting officers, were driving towards Sint Nocolaas, we had an open conversation with the D.S. KALPOE mentioned afore. Of him among others was asked whether the statement he has made was the whole truth or if there had been a plan "B", just in case that which they has agreed to say went wrong and if it indeed was said that if there was no body, the police had no case.
The suspect D.S.KALPOE had said that he had nothing to add to his latest statement, that there has been no plan "B" and that the father of Joran, during one of the times that he and his brother had been at Joran's , had come to them with a book and had explained to them what they needed to know if they were arrested by the police (with the father of Joran, Joran and his brother the following people are indicated, witness P.A.P.J. van der SLOOT, the suspect J.A.P. van der SLOOT and the suspect S.S. KALPOE, comment TROMP) The father of Joran had explained to them that had to be informed of their rights, that they were at first going to be held for six hours, that they could be locked up after that, that they would have to be brought in front of a district attorney within two days, that the district attorney could decide to hold them for eight further days, that after this the judge commissioner could hold them another eight days more, that in total they could be held for 116 days and that after this they could go home because the police does not have a case without a body.
Me, TROMP, asked him again if Joran's father did indeed give some explanations and he this he confirmed.
Of this I have, on my oath as an officer made this proces-verbaal, closed and signed at Bubai on June 14th 2005
The reporting officer
R. R. TROMP
|
|
The crown fits, NOW I am the Princess!
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 523
Location: where IT lives
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| victims cry
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:16 pm |
|
|
|
This is the basis of No body No case???
SS where is the icon of the little man kicking his feet laughing! i need it!
 as i had opined dozens of times, it made perfect sense to me if paul had said that bc as an attorney he would explain the law.
Now we see thats all he was doing.
WHAT SHIT was made over that comment!!! all it was, was a description of what could happen to them if detained and giving them some hope that they cant be railroaded for something they didnt do!!!
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 
|
|
On Vacation!
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 9307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| justamom
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:18 pm |
|
|
|
I ALWAYS figured that Paulus was explaining the way the law worked. Any lawyer would. My attorney is a close friend of the family, and he often gives us legal advice. Its almost second nature for some lawyers to do.
|
|
justaMILF
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 6604
Location: in a cute farmhouse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| iquitos
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:19 pm |
|
|
|
Nova interview
this is exactly what PvdS said he did in his Nova interview.
|
|
beady eyed rat
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 15076
Location: nowhere man
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| sensible
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:21 pm |
|
|
|
| victims cry wrote: | This is the basis of No body No case???
SS where is the icon of the little man kicking his feet laughing! i need it!
as i had opined dozens of times, it made perfect sense to me if paul had said that bc as an attorney he would explain the law.
Now we see thats all he was doing.
WHAT SHIT was made over that comment!!! all it was, was a description of what could happen to them if detained and giving them some hope that they cant be railroaded for something they didnt do!!!
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr |
Let me oblige you, VC -- in fact, I'll join you!
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| spngbobthebldr
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:28 pm |
|
|
|
| victims cry wrote: | This is the basis of No body No case???
SS where is the icon of the little man kicking his feet laughing! i need it!
as i had opined dozens of times, it made perfect sense to me if paul had said that bc as an attorney he would explain the law.
Now we see thats all he was doing.
WHAT SHIT was made over that comment!!! all it was, was a description of what could happen to them if detained and giving them some hope that they cant be railroaded for something they didnt do!!!
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr |
Sure doesn't pack a whollop now does it VC? These statements are backfiring bigtime.
|
|
It ain't easy wearing square pants!
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 2945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dilbart
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:30 pm |
|
|
|
| justamom wrote: | | I ALWAYS figured that Paulus was explaining the way the law worked. Any lawyer would. My attorney is a close friend of the family, and he often gives us legal advice. Its almost second nature for some lawyers to do. |
LOL, our attorney (and close friend) does the same, sometimes it can even be very annoying 
|
|
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 1143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| victims cry
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:35 pm |
|
|
|
| spngbobthebldr wrote: | | victims cry wrote: | This is the basis of No body No case???
SS where is the icon of the little man kicking his feet laughing! i need it!
as i had opined dozens of times, it made perfect sense to me if paul had said that bc as an attorney he would explain the law.
Now we see thats all he was doing.
WHAT SHIT was made over that comment!!! all it was, was a description of what could happen to them if detained and giving them some hope that they cant be railroaded for something they didnt do!!!
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr |
Sure doesn't pack a whollop now does it VC? These statements are backfiring bigtime. |
you know i worried about starting a new thread for just the lies/rants of beth debunked. Didnt really believe there would be more than two that were exposed from the statements themselves that she referred to. Didnt want to make the threads more confusing.
Now im glad i did might be a long one!
|
|
On Vacation!
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 9307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| spngbobthebldr
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:42 pm |
|
|
|
| victims cry wrote: | | spngbobthebldr wrote: | | victims cry wrote: | This is the basis of No body No case???
SS where is the icon of the little man kicking his feet laughing! i need it!
as i had opined dozens of times, it made perfect sense to me if paul had said that bc as an attorney he would explain the law.
Now we see thats all he was doing.
WHAT SHIT was made over that comment!!! all it was, was a description of what could happen to them if detained and giving them some hope that they cant be railroaded for something they didnt do!!!
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr |
Sure doesn't pack a whollop now does it VC? These statements are backfiring bigtime. |
you know i worried about starting a new thread for just the lies/rants of beth debunked. Didnt really believe there would be more than two that were exposed from the statements themselves that she referred to. Didnt want to make the threads more confusing.
Now im glad i did might be a long one! |
I'm sure it won't take long to come up with enough for a book. Another one was their demeanor that night. Seems it wasn't as polite as Beth made it out to be. The man, probably Jug, telling Deepak that "she went out with you assholes and now she's missing" and then Beth's telling Joran at the hotel that he "was going to suffer for what he did". Sure sounds like they went in with guns ablazing and shooting their mouths off. Angry American mob indeed.
|
|
It ain't easy wearing square pants!
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 2945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SMreject1977
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:05 pm |
|
|
|
Seems to me PVDS must have known ALE was never going to find the body and was telling them the worst case is 116 days and you will be free so just stick to the story.
|
|
Official House Troll. No other may apply
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| spngbobthebldr
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:09 pm |
|
|
|
| SMreject1977 wrote: | | Seems to me PVDS must have known ALE was never going to find the body and was telling them the worst case is 116 days and you will be free so just stick to the story. |
Seems to me Paul was a man with a legal background and was telling the boys what they could expect in the coming days.
|
|
It ain't easy wearing square pants!
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 2945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SavannahStar
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:13 pm |
|
|
|
| spngbobthebldr wrote: | | SMreject1977 wrote: | | Seems to me PVDS must have known ALE was never going to find the body and was telling them the worst case is 116 days and you will be free so just stick to the story. |
Seems to me Paul was a man with a legal background and was telling the boys what they could expect in the coming days. |
That's exactly correct. Nothing sinister at all. Not one bit.
|
|
**SuperStar**
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 21291
Location: Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MF
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:27 pm |
|
|
|
| SMreject1977 wrote: | | Seems to me PVDS must have known ALE was never going to find the body and was telling them the worst case is 116 days and you will be free so just stick to the story. |
Yeah, he is a psychic.....Just like the ALE knew when Katrina was coming to release Joran...and that the judges knew there was another war coming to decide on the case of PvdS and the NY civil suit.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 3805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FocusFactor
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:28 pm |
|
|
|
| SMreject1977 wrote: | | Seems to me PVDS must have known ALE was never going to find the body and was telling them the worst case is 116 days and you will be free so just stick to the story. |
LOL, SM, LOL. You just keep telling that to yourself, k?
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 2035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| chillin
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:20 pm |
|
|
|
| FocusFactor wrote: | | SMreject1977 wrote: | | Seems to me PVDS must have known ALE was never going to find the body and was telling them the worst case is 116 days and you will be free so just stick to the story. |
LOL, SM, LOL. You just keep telling that to yourself, k? |
From what I read Jorans father did no more than what any good father would do..he gave his son advice. What parent..uhmm good parent wouldn't?
|
|
On dE bUs.....
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 4092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| justamom
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:47 pm |
|
|
|
| chillin wrote: | | FocusFactor wrote: | | SMreject1977 wrote: | | Seems to me PVDS must have known ALE was never going to find the body and was telling them the worst case is 116 days and you will be free so just stick to the story. |
LOL, SM, LOL. You just keep telling that to yourself, k? |
From what I read Jorans father did no more than what any good father would do..he gave his son advice. What parent..uhmm good parent wouldn't? |
As a parent myself it is common sense to want to protect and help your child the best way possible. Paulus had legal knowledge and used it to help his son. Im sure it went more along the lines of just tell the truth, if you did nothing they cant do anything to you. If shes alive, then there is no body anyway. I mean damn, Im not even a lawyer and know that. Its common sense.
|
|
justaMILF
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 6604
Location: in a cute farmhouse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MF
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:54 pm |
|
|
|
This document showed us where the Twitts got their "no body no case" logo they used to sell their case in the public opinion.
Either they mistranslate everything they got in the beginning or they thought that nobody would get hold of these documents and could use these against the suspect and use them against Aruba.
They were even used in the civil suit.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 3805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JD
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:12 pm |
|
|
|
| MF wrote: | This document showed us where the Twitts got their "no body no case" logo they used to sell their case in the public opinion.
Either they mistranslate everything they got in the beginning or they thought that nobody would get hold of these documents and could use these against the suspect and use them against Aruba.
They were even used in the civil suit. |
the police does not have a case without a body.
How did the "Twitts" misrepresent what was said?
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 7108
Location: Too Close for Comfort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MF
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:14 pm |
|
|
|
| JD wrote: | | MF wrote: | This document showed us where the Twitts got their "no body no case" logo they used to sell their case in the public opinion.
Either they mistranslate everything they got in the beginning or they thought that nobody would get hold of these documents and could use these against the suspect and use them against Aruba.
They were even used in the civil suit. |
the police does not have a case without a body.
How did the "Twitts" misrepresent what was said? |
No VI2, that by that statement was how PvdS thought/instructed the kids. You can go back and check how many times they said that and that is why PvdS was guilty too.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 3805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Heli
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:14 pm |
|
|
|
| JD wrote: | | MF wrote: | This document showed us where the Twitts got their "no body no case" logo they used to sell their case in the public opinion.
Either they mistranslate everything they got in the beginning or they thought that nobody would get hold of these documents and could use these against the suspect and use them against Aruba.
They were even used in the civil suit. |
the police does not have a case without a body.
How did the "Twitts" misrepresent what was said? |
The girl hadn't been found, there was no sign of her.
The police were detaining under suspicion of kidnap, murder
inter alia
Why would it seem unusual for Paul to advise the boys
that without a body, there is no case for murder?
|
|
Transcription Goddess
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 23516
Location: Puffed Up DimWit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| chillin
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:15 pm |
|
|
|
| JD wrote: | | MF wrote: | This document showed us where the Twitts got their "no body no case" logo they used to sell their case in the public opinion.
Either they mistranslate everything they got in the beginning or they thought that nobody would get hold of these documents and could use these against the suspect and use them against Aruba.
They were even used in the civil suit. |
the police does not have a case without a body.
How did the "Twitts" misrepresent what was said? |
I think that was a statement taken out of context and since it was so 'juicy' the family took it and ran with it.
|
|
On dE bUs.....
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 4092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JD
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:17 pm |
|
|
|
| Heli wrote: | | JD wrote: | | MF wrote: | This document showed us where the Twitts got their "no body no case" logo they used to sell their case in the public opinion.
Either they mistranslate everything they got in the beginning or they thought that nobody would get hold of these documents and could use these against the suspect and use them against Aruba.
They were even used in the civil suit. |
the police does not have a case without a body.
How did the "Twitts" misrepresent what was said? |
The girl hadn't been found, there was no sign of her.
The police were detaining under suspicion of kidnap, murder
inter alia
Why would it seem unusual for Paul to advise the boys
that without a body, there is no case for murder? |
I never thought it was unusual at all for Paul to make that comment; I never saw it as sinister in the least. But the H/T didnt misrepresent it either.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 7108
Location: Too Close for Comfort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MF
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:19 pm |
|
|
|
LOL...
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 3805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Heli
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:21 pm |
|
|
|
| JD wrote: | | Heli wrote: | | JD wrote: | | MF wrote: | This document showed us where the Twitts got their "no body no case" logo they used to sell their case in the public opinion.
Either they mistranslate everything they got in the beginning or they thought that nobody would get hold of these documents and could use these against the suspect and use them against Aruba.
They were even used in the civil suit. |
the police does not have a case without a body.
How did the "Twitts" misrepresent what was said? |
The girl hadn't been found, there was no sign of her.
The police were detaining under suspicion of kidnap, murder
inter alia
Why would it seem unusual for Paul to advise the boys
that without a body, there is no case for murder? |
I never thought it was unusual at all for Paul to make that comment; I never saw it as sinister in the least. But the H/T didnt misrepresent it either. |
The H/T didn't misrepresent that words to that effect
were spoken by him.
They did use those words to insinuate consciousness of guilt
on the part of J2K's and Paul van der Sloot. It's a big leap
I'd say.
|
|
Transcription Goddess
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 23516
Location: Puffed Up DimWit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JD
Posted:
Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:28 pm |
|
|
|
| Heli wrote: |
The H/T didn't misrepresent that words to that effect
were spoken by him.
They did use those words to insinuate consciousness of guilt
on the part of J2K's and Paul van der Sloot. It's a big leap
I'd say. |
I agree it's a big leap. I think it's been said (maybe by KJ?) that Paul was arrested because he interfered in the case---I assume it goes beyond this statement? It's hazy but I thought there was something about him talking to Joran in jail and he was prohibited from visiting him after a time, do you recall?
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 7108
Location: Too Close for Comfort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
