IUPG is not bs
 

Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Refugees Unleashed Forum Index -> Natalee Holloway Case Discussion


IUPG is not bs - Goto page 1, 2  Next
  View previous topic :: View next topic
pax PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:50 pm

IUPG is not bs

Innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

That's how I roll. Cool




Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 16326
Location: Wish You Were Here
resigned PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:07 pm

Not guilty in a court of law doesn't make one innocent of wrongdoing...it just makes one not guilty in a court of law. JMO



Very Happy
Click your heels together...



Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 28578
Location: "Onboard" pathenry's desk
plhtx1 PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:09 pm

Re: IUPG is not bs

pax wrote:
Innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

That's how I roll. Cool


And I guess you think OJ is innocent because the court found him not guilty




Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 2288
Location: The Vail Valley
iquitos PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:10 pm

OJ is innocent until proven guilty

He has not been proven guilty. So he is innocent, legally. The rest is bullshit. I am sure he would agree.
beady eyed rat



Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 15076
Location: nowhere man
K_Meine PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:13 pm

Re: IUPG is not bs

plhtx1 wrote:


And I guess you think OJ is innocent because the court found him not guilty


If the shoe doesn't fit, you must acquit. All together now, if the shoe.....

whatever happened to those bloody shoes? Shocked




Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 1656

plhtx1 PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:14 pm

Re: IUPG is not bs

K_Meine wrote:


If the shoe doesn't fit, you must acquit. All together now, if the shoe.....

whatever happened to those bloody shoes? Shocked


LMAO, are we sure there were some shoes or just more of Joran's BS




Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 2288
Location: The Vail Valley
toodles PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: OJ is innocent until proven guilty

iquitos wrote:
He has not been proven guilty. So he is innocent, legally. The rest is bullshit. I am sure he would agree.


Hes free, not innocent. Wait till God gets a hold of him.
** Timeout **



Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 2388
Location: Lousy Poster
iquitos PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:27 pm

Re: OJ is innocent until proven guilty

toodles wrote:


Hes free, not innocent. Wait till God gets a hold of him.


he is innocent according to the legal system of the United States. It is a central element of our social compact. Right to a trial by a jury of peers. G-d is another matter. Neither of us is G-d. Do you think OJ is a believer?
beady eyed rat



Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 15076
Location: nowhere man
K_Meine PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:37 pm

Re: OJ is innocent until proven guilty

iquitos wrote:


he is innocent according to the legal system of the United States. It is a central element of our social compact. Right to a trial by a jury of peers. G-d is another matter. Neither of us is G-d. Do you think OJ is a believer?


Unfortunately, I'd imagine most doers of bad deeds are not believers until it's too late. "The torture of a bad conscience is the hell of a living soul."




Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 1656

Gregor PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:46 pm

Re: OJ is innocent until proven guilty

K_Meine wrote:

<snip>

"The torture of a bad conscience is the hell of a living soul."


Are you speaking from experience?




Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1847

K_Meine PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:48 pm

Re: OJ is innocent until proven guilty

Gregor wrote:


Are you speaking from experience?


Yes




Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 1656

toodles PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 4:11 pm

Re: OJ is innocent until proven guilty

iquitos wrote:


he is innocent according to the legal system of the United States. It is a central element of our social compact. Right to a trial by a jury of peers. G-d is another matter. Neither of us is G-d. Do you think OJ is a believer?


Maybe a believer but not a follower. Least not then. Maybe he has seeked forgiveness since he murdered.
** Timeout **



Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 2388
Location: Lousy Poster
CherokeeKid PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:33 pm

Re: IUPG is not bs

pax wrote:
Innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

That's how I roll. Cool


That's a great attitude, Pax!

And I think the Ramsey case is a good example. The Ramseys were not charged or conviced of any crime but they still had to go through hell as they were only convicted in the media. I found it great that the new procecutor made a public statement and apologised to them.




Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 6348

resigned PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:46 pm

Re: IUPG is not bs

CherokeeKid wrote:


That's a great attitude, Pax!

And I think the Ramsey case is a good example. The Ramseys were not charged or conviced of any crime but they still had to go through hell as they were only convicted in the media. I found it great that the new procecutor made a public statement and apologised to them.


I used to love how they made up stories of disposing of Jon-Benet - what a riot that John and Patsy were....

Oh wait - they never did that. Very Happy
Click your heels together...



Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 28578
Location: "Onboard" pathenry's desk
~kaRN PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:11 pm

The Ramsey's are guilty of gross child abuse IMO. No DNA will clear them of that.




Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 3498
Location: Behind this guy!
Topsider PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:13 pm

Re: OJ is innocent until proven guilty

iquitos wrote:


he is innocent according to the legal system of the United States. It is a central element of our social compact. Right to a trial by a jury of peers. G-d is another matter. Neither of us is G-d. Do you think OJ is a believer?


I thought all of this happened in Aruba




Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 2203
Location: On Hiatus Beach
Bubbles PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:19 pm

Re: IUPG is not bs

resigned wrote:


I used to love how they made up stories of disposing of Jon-Benet - what a riot that John and Patsy were....

Oh wait - they never did that. Very Happy


Sure they did. That idiot detective even wrote a book declaring their guilt for which he got royally sued. NE even accused the son. Patsy was accused of murdering J-B for wetting the bed. John was accused of sexually molesting her. Because they lawyered up immediatly PROVED their guilt. Rolling Eyes The hell they put them thru killed Patsy. Rolling Eyes




Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 8021

Bubbles PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:21 pm

~kaRN wrote:
The Ramsey's are guilty of gross child abuse IMO. No DNA will clear them of that.


You must be joking! They kind, loving and doting parents.




Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 8021

sandraK PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:32 pm

Re: IUPG is not bs

pax wrote:
Innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

That's how I roll. Cool

I wish you were so kind to me
Boat Drink Room Hostess



Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 6505

iquitos PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:34 pm

Re: OJ is innocent until proven guilty

Topsider wrote:


I thought all of this happened in Aruba


aruba operates along similar d-tch lines.
beady eyed rat



Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 15076
Location: nowhere man
wehwalt PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:42 pm

Re: OJ is innocent until proven guilty

toodles wrote:


Hes free, not innocent. Wait till God gets a hold of him.


Obviously you feel you're getting a pass there.




Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 1255

wildroses PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:52 pm

Re: OJ is innocent until proven guilty

wehwalt wrote:


Obviously you feel you're getting a pass there.



Laughing Fit 1 Laughing Fit 1




Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 5940
Location: Not WildFlowers, Not wildcat
K_Meine PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:16 am

Re: OJ is innocent until proven guilty

iquitos wrote:


aruba operates along similar d-tch lines.


Well there's a confidence booster. Laughing Laughing Laughing




Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 1656

FloridaDoug PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:28 am

Re: OJ is innocent until proven guilty

K_Meine wrote:

iquitos wrote:


aruba operates along similar d-tch lines.


Well there's a confidence booster. Laughing Laughing Laughing


confidence in what?




Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 851

K_Meine PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:45 am

Re: OJ is innocent until proven guilty

FloridaDoug wrote:


confidence in what?


T H A T T H E D U T C H A N D T H E A R U B A N S O P E R A T E
U N D E R T H E S A M E L E G A L S Y S T E M.




Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 1656

Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Refugees Unleashed Forum Index -> Natalee Holloway Case Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Jasidogdotcom template v.1.0.4 © jasidog.com
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2004 phpBB Group
Template by Jasidog Template by Jasidog