| Beth 2 Hrs of Interrogation Where's the Proces Verbaal?? - |
| View previous topic
:: View next topic |
Heli
 Posted:
Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:22 pm |
|
|
|
Beth 2 Hrs of Interrogation Where's the Proces Verbaal??
Nov 4, 2005
Bon Dia Aruba
Translated by Aruba Getagrip
Mrs. Twitty came with a group of American journalists who were at all times walking with her. And although she told the Strategic Commission that she did not know that some media would follow her to Aruba, it was obvious that they had a very close relationship. Her friend was in the car with an MSNBC producer, for example.
Mrs. Twitty entered accompanied by her friend Carol followed by her attorney Helen Lejuez who also came in. But her brother Paul Reynolds, who arrived in a taxi, could not enter. Police did not permit this.
The conversation, which was more like an interrogation, lasted a few hours, contrary to what Mrs. Twitty thought, given that she brought two recorded tapes with her declaration and what from what can be deduced from the time that she remained inside, police decided to make some touchy questions.
The presence of lead prosecutor Karin Jansen was also noted, but she did not remain long at the Shaba police station.
She was also asked if she was going to speak with the American channels that night, and Twitty said she had no plans to do so. But as is usual with Mrs. Twitty, this did not turn out to be the truth, since that same night she was on Greta van Susteren on FOX News saying that the Strategic Commission is in agreement with her about changing those who are working on the case.
This was completely denied by the Strategic Commission.
Two hours of interview/interrogation should have resulted in
ALE officers producing a PV. Of course, we know that Beth
couldn't hightail it out of Aruba fast enough when she left the
police station, therefore one would assume she did not sign
a PV.
Many of the PV's we've seen from BFN and/or SM have been
unsigned by a suspect or witness so, I'd like to know when
Beth Twitty's PV will be published on the internet.
I'd also be curious to know whether ALE kept Beth's two
audiotapes or whether she retracted them given she was
required to submit to questioning.
|
|
Transcription Goddess
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 23410
Location: Puffed Up DimWit
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| iquitos
Posted:
Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:55 pm |
|
|
|
mrs. twitty's hidden proces verbaal?
excellent question! hell will freeze over before that one gets out.
|
|
beady eyed rat
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 14456
Location: nowhere man
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mariah
Posted:
Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:17 pm |
|
|
|
Beth doesn't have her statements to release. Even if she did it won't see the light of day.
|
|
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 1150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Linny1125
Posted:
Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:28 pm |
|
|
|
How is it that ALL of Joran's "unsigned" statements are plastered all over the net, but Beth's are not? 
|
|
Cleeking On Ploberdees
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 943
Location: Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JD
Posted:
Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:32 pm |
|
|
|
She did sign a statement. Remember, Jacobs transcribed it or something and brought it to her (while she was in the bar racking up the $18,000 tab  ) but it was in Dutch and she signed it anyway. I believe later she said that Dennis had changed it unbeknownst to her. In any event, she signed a statement.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 7108
Location: Too Close for Comfort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JD
Posted:
Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:33 pm |
|
|
|
Does anyone really think there's going to be anything different in Beth's statement than what we've heard her say for over a year? Still, I'd love to see it too.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 7108
Location: Too Close for Comfort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DiamondDot
Posted:
Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:41 pm |
|
|
|
It's been posted that ALE refused to accept Beth's taped statement. I can understand that they would not accept it as fact, but to not accept it into evidence would be foolish.
So.... did they accept it or not?
it's also been posted that ALE was not interested in anything that occurred on the US Nat'l fauxnewsinfotainnment programs. I really don't understand this either. IMO, public statements are very important.
|
|
Double D
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 8571
Location: Surfin' the Rhythms of the Universe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DiamondDot
Posted:
Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:43 pm |
|
|
|
| JD wrote: | | Does anyone really think there's going to be anything different in Beth's statement than what we've heard her say for over a year? Still, I'd love to see it too. |
I'd like to know which version of the versions of the lies Beth is trying to pass off as official statement.
|
|
Double D
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 8571
Location: Surfin' the Rhythms of the Universe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JD
Posted:
Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:44 pm |
|
|
|
| DiamondDot wrote: | It's been posted that ALE refused to accept Beth's taped statement. I can understand that they would not accept it as fact, but to not accept it into evidence would be foolish.
So.... did they accept it or not?
it's also been posted that ALE was not interested in anything that occurred on the US Nat'l fauxnewsinfotainnment programs. I really don't understand this either. IMO, public statements are very important. |
I agree. I would be surprised if they didnt keep it as evidence, same with all the public statements from everyone involved in this case.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 7108
Location: Too Close for Comfort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JD
Posted:
Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:45 pm |
|
|
|
| DiamondDot wrote: | | JD wrote: | | Does anyone really think there's going to be anything different in Beth's statement than what we've heard her say for over a year? Still, I'd love to see it too. |
I'd like to know which version of the versions of the lies Beth is trying to pass off as official statement. |
Dont know exactly but she would only be giving a statement about what's within her personal knowledge. They wouldnt be asking her if she thought J2K were kidnapping murdering rapists -- althought I bet she tried to get that in.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 7108
Location: Too Close for Comfort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| frrp
Posted:
Sun Sep 24, 2006 12:32 am |
|
|
|
| JD wrote: | | DiamondDot wrote: | | JD wrote: | | Does anyone really think there's going to be anything different in Beth's statement than what we've heard her say for over a year? Still, I'd love to see it too. |
I'd like to know which version of the versions of the lies Beth is trying to pass off as official statement. |
Dont know exactly but she would only be giving a statement about what's within her personal knowledge. They wouldnt be asking her if she thought J2K were kidnapping murdering rapists -- althought I bet she tried to get that in. |
.
do personal knowledge count as facts?cause you know and everyone else knows " personal knowlege anyone can make up unless they on cam,.
|
|
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 1710
Location: NORGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| frrp
Posted:
Sun Sep 24, 2006 12:34 am |
|
|
|
So , you being a lawyer an all. how will you handle this case? since you seems to agree with >beth... VC if this is rude or agaist the ruels delete my post
|
|
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 1710
Location: NORGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JD
Posted:
Sun Sep 24, 2006 12:36 am |
|
|
|
| frrp wrote: | | So , you being a lawyer an all. how will you handle this case? since you seems to agree with >beth... VC if this is rude or agaist the ruels delete my post |
Actually I think you have misinterpreted because I dont agree with Beth."Personal knowledge" -- she testifies to what she has seen, heard, etc. and not what she guesses happened. Sure she can lie, we've seen lots of statements released where the witness lied.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 7108
Location: Too Close for Comfort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| resigned
Posted:
Sun Sep 24, 2006 6:22 am |
|
|
|
| JD wrote: | | She did sign a statement. Remember, Jacobs transcribed it or something and brought it to her (while she was in the bar racking up the $18,000 tab ) but it was in Dutch and she signed it anyway. I believe later she said that Dennis had changed it unbeknownst to her. In any event, she signed a statement. |
Did she make a statement claiming that? 
Does she sign everything she can't read, or was this after she learned enough Dutch to take notes from the torn up statement she saw on Jacob's desk?
The lies this woman has told are unbelievable and inconsistent. To trust anything she says as a truth is an exercise in futility.
We can agree to disagree that anything Beth has said as having any merit.
She drank, she notched on shrimp, and she signed statements all while she was in a 118 hour deep sleep....GMAB. Who knows??
|
|
Click your heels together...
Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 27555
Location: "Onboard" pathenry's desk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MF
Posted:
Wed Sep 27, 2006 5:16 pm |
|
|
|
| JD wrote: | | She did sign a statement. Remember, Jacobs transcribed it or something and brought it to her (while she was in the bar racking up the $18,000 tab ) but it was in Dutch and she signed it anyway. I believe later she said that Dennis had changed it unbeknownst to her. In any event, she signed a statement. |
This was her innitial Statement to police, that she wanted changed in the first 24 hours, 'cause she heard totally other things in Dutch sitting in her car, while all other people speaking Dutch and Papiamento heard other thing.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 3805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| frrp
Posted:
Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:51 am |
|
|
|
This was her innitial Statement to police, that she wanted changed in the first 24 hours, 'cause she heard totally other things in Dutch sitting in her car, while all other people speaking Dutch and Papiamento heard other thing.[/quote]
MF god morgen .
*smiles* ah the things one can understand in a sec of languages that one does not speak.*smiles* it is a masterpiece.
|
|
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 1710
Location: NORGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| frrp
Posted:
Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:58 am |
|
|
|
These statements that are online makes no sense . whoever is translating it , seems to lack the proper legal words . Is it an authorize legal translater doing this? from what I've read ,it seems weird with no name sign to it , and it seems someone wrote some stuff down with what they think/assume/ or their idea of this is what happened.
Cause I did not see a question and answer statement .
|
|
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 1710
Location: NORGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
