| At this point I don't believe anything anymore - Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 |
| View previous topic
:: View next topic |
Sultan
 Posted:
Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:09 pm |
|
|
|
[quote="Heli]
Could that have something to do with the fact
that evidence pointed in that direction? There are
highly reputable forensic scientists who continue to
be of the opinion that there is no valid evidence to
support there was an intruder.
We may all have this put to rest soon when JMK's
DNA is compared to the profile of the male DNA
found on JonBenet's underwear. **I'm not holding
my breath
My comments are not an endorsement of the
investigation in Boulder; we all know the shortcomings
of it.[/quote]
What I have read of the case I don't see that much pointing to the parents. Other forinsic experts refute Cycil contentions.
The police made up there mind the first day then tried to make the evidence fit. If they had been objective it may have worked out differently. All though if Karr turns out to be responsible it would have been a tough case to crack.
|
|
Swinging the Ladies
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 2354
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| SavannahStar
Posted:
Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:11 pm |
|
|
|
| Sultan wrote: | What I have read of the case I don't see that much pointing to the parents. Other forinsic experts refute Cycil contentions.
The police made up there mind the first day then tried to make the evidence fit. If they had been objective it may have worked out differently. All though if Karr turns out to be responsible it would have been a tough case to crack. |
ITA.
Wrong forum though.  Guess it's Friday night and we're all getting loopy. 
|
|
**SuperStar**
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 21298
Location: Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sultan
Posted:
Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:13 pm |
|
|
|
| K_Meine wrote: | | Quote: | | She was not there. Is that good enough for you? |
Wow, Sultan you may want to order your underpants one size larger next time so as not to cause further discomfort. . A simple yes or no will do.
Anyway, that's Bullocks she didn't show. Maybe she has moved on, but how about a little respect? |
Sorry you took my comments the way you did. I was being serious as to what is credible proof to you. Was not disrepecting you.
|
|
Swinging the Ladies
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 2354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BhamMom
Posted:
Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:57 pm |
|
|
|
| reddog wrote: | | BhamMom wrote: | | charlierat wrote: | | reddog wrote: | | grantbk wrote: | Reddog, you may be in the dog house soon. I think you know what i meant by "her".
A quote from my post:
| Quote: | What is Beth hiding?
Why is her favorite site posting wasted admissions unsigned by the suspects, and with poor translations, that were possibly discarded papers where LE may have put their own scenarios on, useless for a court of law? |
The leading sentence of that paragraph began with Beth, so is it difficult to envision that subsequent "hers" would be Beth?
Never mind, back to Where is Natalee? |
nope. the "paragraph" as it was, began with "Think Natalee left absolutely no trace from a small Island, and no one saw a thing. ". |
Yeah, and the sentence immediately prior to the offending sentence about "her" favorite website reads as follows, "What is Beth hiding?" There is no other way to read the next sentence and not realize that it is inquirung about Beth.
Is this what it's come to? An attempt to discredit Grant based on some faulty grammer lesson?
Oh, well, just consider the cource. |
O/T.......I called it.
Charlie, who was the cource? |
and what is "inquirung"? |
Reddog, I think you and I are going to get into trouble. 
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 13086
Location: Posting with bitter people
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| reddog
Posted:
Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:59 pm |
|
|
|
| BhamMom wrote: |
Reddog, I think you and I are going to get into trouble. |
what makes you think that?
and "in trouble" with whom?
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 13981
Location: manning THE No-Bullshit Gang's bullshit detector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BhamMom
Posted:
Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:04 pm |
|
|
|
| reddog wrote: | | BhamMom wrote: |
Reddog, I think you and I are going to get into trouble. |
what makes you think that?
and "in trouble" with whom? |
With Charlie.
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 13086
Location: Posting with bitter people
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| reddog
Posted:
Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:08 pm |
|
|
|
| BhamMom wrote: | | reddog wrote: | | BhamMom wrote: |
Reddog, I think you and I are going to get into trouble. |
what makes you think that?
and "in trouble" with whom? |
With Charlie. |
rotflmfao.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 13981
Location: manning THE No-Bullshit Gang's bullshit detector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
