| Computer Records, Jaime, Deepak again - Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
| View previous topic
:: View next topic |
pausebreak
 Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 12:44 am |
|
|
|
| Absalom and Achitophel wrote: | | Perhaps they are trying to provoke a legal confrontation somewhere with someone by doing this. In order to get someone, anyone, in any court anywhere, in order to try to "get answers" as they love to claim. |
I think it is more an effort by the Twitty/Holloway gangs and their minions to claim it was because of these documents (that they thought for sure had to be real  ) that caused them to wrongly accuse J2K. There is always an underlying motive in what these people do.
|
|
Soopa Soopa Bitch !!
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 5550
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| Absalom and Achitophel
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:20 am |
|
|
|
| pausebreak wrote: | | Absalom and Achitophel wrote: | | Perhaps they are trying to provoke a legal confrontation somewhere with someone by doing this. In order to get someone, anyone, in any court anywhere, in order to try to "get answers" as they love to claim. |
I think it is more an effort by the Twitty/Holloway gangs and their minions to claim it was because of these documents (that they thought for sure had to be real ) that caused them to wrongly accuse J2K. There is always an underlying motive in what these people do. |
I think you are right. On both counts. An additional motive is to show that their little lawsuit in NY was "true" as they came from these "real" documents. Everything released to date has a snippet which has been plugged into the now deceased law suit including:
- sexual assault a/k/a "finger ring"
- drugged and in and out of... a/k/a "dozing"
- sexual predator /a/k/a "wild sex on piers with hot chicks while buddy peers"
- drinking problems a/k/a "can't recall the girls last name house no or tel no"
- father approves and promotes all this a/k/a "dad can I go out tonight"
The whole a/k/a the simple mind of simple people from Mississipi and Arkansas.
|
|
Joined: 01 Apr 2006
Posts: 218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Heli
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:32 am |
|
|
|
| Absalom and Achitophel wrote: | | pausebreak wrote: | | Absalom and Achitophel wrote: | | Perhaps they are trying to provoke a legal confrontation somewhere with someone by doing this. In order to get someone, anyone, in any court anywhere, in order to try to "get answers" as they love to claim. |
I think it is more an effort by the Twitty/Holloway gangs and their minions to claim it was because of these documents (that they thought for sure had to be real ) that caused them to wrongly accuse J2K. There is always an underlying motive in what these people do. |
I think you are right. On both counts. An additional motive is to show that their little lawsuit in NY was "true" as they came from these "real" documents. Everything released to date has a snippet which has been plugged into the now deceased law suit including:
- sexual assault a/k/a "finger ring"
- drugged and in and out of... a/k/a "dozing"
- sexual predator /a/k/a "wild sex on piers with hot chicks while buddy peers"
- drinking problems a/k/a "can't recall the girls last name house no or tel no"
- father approves and promotes all this a/k/a "dad can I go out tonight"
The whole a/k/a the simple mind of simple people from Mississipi and Arkansas. |
The New York suit was not dismissed on the merits.
It was dismissed for forum non conveniens, so posting all
this stuff to show that the suit had merit would be rather
ridiculous considering the reason for the Judge's ruling.
|
|
Transcription Goddess
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 23410
Location: Puffed Up DimWit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JD
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:41 am |
|
|
|
| Heli wrote: |
The New York suit was not dismissed on the merits.
It was dismissed for forum non conveniens, so posting all
this stuff to show that the suit had merit would be rather
ridiculous considering the reason for the Judge's ruling. |
Yes. I dont believe it has anything to do with the NY ruling other than someone made a decision to not post them until there was a ruling.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 7108
Location: Too Close for Comfort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BhamMom
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:44 am |
|
|
|
Why doesn't Debbie ask Beth to post her telephone records for the time Natalee was in Aruba. Better yet, why not post Natalee's. She was on a cell phone at the casino. They saw it.
|
|
** Banned **
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 13086
Location: Posting with bitter people
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| reddog
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:44 am |
|
|
|
| JD wrote: | | Heli wrote: |
The New York suit was not dismissed on the merits.
It was dismissed for forum non conveniens, so posting all
this stuff to show that the suit had merit would be rather
ridiculous considering the reason for the Judge's ruling. |
Yes. I dont believe it has anything to do with the NY ruling other than someone made a decision to not post them until there was a ruling. |
"someone" being the operative word...
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 13981
Location: manning THE No-Bullshit Gang's bullshit detector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JD
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:59 am |
|
|
|
| reddog wrote: | | JD wrote: | | Heli wrote: |
The New York suit was not dismissed on the merits.
It was dismissed for forum non conveniens, so posting all
this stuff to show that the suit had merit would be rather
ridiculous considering the reason for the Judge's ruling. |
Yes. I dont believe it has anything to do with the NY ruling other than someone made a decision to not post them until there was a ruling. |
"someone" being the operative word... |
Well, yes. I dont know who is making the decisons. lol But I know who it is not.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 7108
Location: Too Close for Comfort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| acala
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:09 am |
|
|
|
JD, of those who have been suspected, who do you think it is not? TIA
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| sandraK
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:29 am |
|
|
|
| reddog wrote: | | JD wrote: | | Heli wrote: |
The New York suit was not dismissed on the merits.
It was dismissed for forum non conveniens, so posting all
this stuff to show that the suit had merit would be rather
ridiculous considering the reason for the Judge's ruling. |
Yes. I dont believe it has anything to do with the NY ruling other than someone made a decision to not post them until there was a ruling. |
"someone" being the operative word... |
Yes, RD and there is a big rush to find out what posters know and who they are.
|
|
Boat Drink Room Hostess
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 6436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| lushus
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:33 am |
|
|
|
| MoonShadows wrote: | | And it's from this document that the family spread the rumor about the famous PIMP word... |
 Well moon, those poor unsuspecting Brookies had never heard "that" word before ..
Yeah riiiiiiiiight 
|
|
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 8288
Location: Oo(^.^)y-~~ smokin\'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| lushus
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:37 am |
|
|
|
| pathenry wrote: | Do they have Natalee's computer records up yet? Somebody "page" me when they do.  |
You won't be holding your breath will you???
That would be life-threatening ..
|
|
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 8288
Location: Oo(^.^)y-~~ smokin\'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| gagal_05
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:06 am |
|
|
|
| JD wrote: | | Heli wrote: |
The New York suit was not dismissed on the merits.
It was dismissed for forum non conveniens, so posting all
this stuff to show that the suit had merit would be rather
ridiculous considering the reason for the Judge's ruling. |
Yes. I dont believe it has anything to do with the NY ruling other than someone made a decision to not post them until there was a ruling. |
You would again be wrong. Tsk, tsk, tsk - coming from an "alleged" officer of the court!
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 5296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JD
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:41 am |
|
|
|
| acala wrote: | | JD, of those who have been suspected, who do you think it is not? TIA |
I'm just playing. I dont know who it is or isnt--that was just a play on words from something funny a poster used to say.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 7108
Location: Too Close for Comfort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| gagal_05
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:47 am |
|
|
|
| JD wrote: | | Heli wrote: |
The New York suit was not dismissed on the merits.
It was dismissed for forum non conveniens, so posting all
this stuff to show that the suit had merit would be rather
ridiculous considering the reason for the Judge's ruling. |
Yes. I dont believe it has anything to do with the NY ruling other than someone made a decision to not post them until there was a ruling. |
Get real. Beth is ticked because she lost the NY case. She is determined to win, no matter how she goes about it. Turning this case into a freakshow is very telling of her character.
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 5296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WangChung
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:50 am |
|
|
|
| gagal_05 wrote: | | JD wrote: | | Heli wrote: |
The New York suit was not dismissed on the merits.
It was dismissed for forum non conveniens, so posting all
this stuff to show that the suit had merit would be rather
ridiculous considering the reason for the Judge's ruling. |
Yes. I dont believe it has anything to do with the NY ruling other than someone made a decision to not post them until there was a ruling. |
Get real. Beth is ticked because she lost the NY case. She is determined to win, no matter how she goes about it. Turning this case into a freakshow is very telling of her character. |
And what a freakshow this has become. Natalee giving hand jobs????
|
|
Everybody Have Fun Tonight
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 11451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MF
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 8:13 am |
|
|
|
| WangChung wrote: | | gagal_05 wrote: | | JD wrote: | | Heli wrote: |
The New York suit was not dismissed on the merits.
It was dismissed for forum non conveniens, so posting all
this stuff to show that the suit had merit would be rather
ridiculous considering the reason for the Judge's ruling. |
Yes. I dont believe it has anything to do with the NY ruling other than someone made a decision to not post them until there was a ruling. |
Get real. Beth is ticked because she lost the NY case. She is determined to win, no matter how she goes about it. Turning this case into a freakshow is very telling of her character. |
And what a freakshow this has become. Natalee giving hand jobs???? |
I thought there was a lot Beth said she did not teach her... could this be one? 
|
|
**Deactivated**
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 3805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Heli
Posted:
Fri Aug 11, 2006 8:18 am |
|
|
|
| MF wrote: | | WangChung wrote: | | gagal_05 wrote: | | JD wrote: | | Heli wrote: |
The New York suit was not dismissed on the merits.
It was dismissed for forum non conveniens, so posting all
this stuff to show that the suit had merit would be rather
ridiculous considering the reason for the Judge's ruling. |
Yes. I dont believe it has anything to do with the NY ruling other than someone made a decision to not post them until there was a ruling. |
Get real. Beth is ticked because she lost the NY case. She is determined to win, no matter how she goes about it. Turning this case into a freakshow is very telling of her character. |
And what a freakshow this has become. Natalee giving hand jobs???? |
I thought there was a lot Beth said she did not teach her... could this be one? |
In the words of Annie Oakley: "doin what comes naturly"
It's in the jeans (sic)
|
|
Transcription Goddess
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 23410
Location: Puffed Up DimWit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
